From 20133f916cbe37f8376bc207ab76cb7b9a5f9c50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ItsDrike Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 14:57:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo --- content/posts/changing-license.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/content/posts/changing-license.md b/content/posts/changing-license.md index 2b13ee2..ebaa7f3 100644 --- a/content/posts/changing-license.md +++ b/content/posts/changing-license.md @@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ rights to modification. ### Unintentionally proprietary -In a lot of cases, the lack of license actually wasn't intentionally, and the author actually intended for their code -to be open-sourced, but they just weren't aware that to do so, they need to add a license. +In a lot of cases, the lack of license actually wasn't intentional, and the author actually intended for their code to +be open-sourced, but they just weren't aware that to do so, they need to add a license. What's even worse is when someone actually makes a contribution to this kind of project, and the author accepts it. The thing is, that contributor was never authorized to even make a contribution, as it's a modification of the code-base,